The first thing i did for my rhetorical analysis paper was sit down and annotate the article. I tore it to pieces. I searched for any little thing i could incorporate into my paper, rhetorical devices, interesting metaphors, the different people mentioned, everything. I had three highlighters, one blue, one green, and one pink. The blue was used to highlight interesting and effective diction. This helped me provide examples in my writing. The green was used to highlight the people he mentioned, I counted twenty-three. The pink was used to highlight interesting wording, metaphors i hadn't seen before, simply the different things that stuck out to me in his writing. After the long a dreadful annotating process I read the article again. Then i let it sink in for a while.
When i sat down to write my rough draft i just stared at the computer screen for a while. I put my name and date in the top left corner (MLA format, of course) and typed a generic title and just took a minute to think. I thought about what i wanted to say. How i wanted to go about describing Nicholas Carr's writing style. Needless to say my first draft was a mess, but thats what first drafts are for right? So you can revise, edit, and fine tune your writing. So that's what i did.
After draft one was complete i started revising. I picked it apart and looked for things that needed fixing, or things that needed to be taken out completely. The revision process took a while. I went paragraph by paragraph to make them the best they could be. Then i would hand it to a peer to look over my work, and fresh set of eyes is always beneficial, they catch things i wouldn't notice otherwise. Finally, all said and done, i had written what i believe to be a very solid paper. I had a friend at work edit it for grammatical errors and then on Friday, October 28th 2011, i handed my pride and joy rhetorical analysis paper to Mrs. Cardona. It felt GREAT.
NEW BLOG
10 years ago